The Bahnsen-Sproul Debate

The Bahnsen-Sproul Debate

A friendly debate between two Reformed scholars at Reformed Seminary in Jackson, MS. This series explores the differences between classical and presuppositional apologetic methods. The first two lectures are the debate itself. The last two (216 parts a and b) are a...
Reasoning with Unbelievers

Reasoning with Unbelievers

Learn why Christians should argue or provide reasons for the Christian faith and what the proper or biblical method of reasoning is. 01 — Should We Reason with Unbelievers? (1 of 3) 02 — How Should We Reason? Part 1 (2 of 3) 03 — How Should We Reason? Part 2 (3 of...
Paul’s View of the Gospel

Paul’s View of the Gospel

An exposition of Romans chapter three that underscores the grace of the gospel while contending against Schuller’s view of sin, the Roman Catholic view of justification, and dispensational views of the law. 01 — Silenced by Sin: Romans 3:1-20 (1 of 3) 02 —...
Theistic Proof, Rationalism, & Fideism

Theistic Proof, Rationalism, & Fideism

Can the existence of God be rationally proven? Dr. Bahnsen says yes. He also says that Christians cannot be either rationalists or fideists. The notion that presuppositionalism rejects theistic proof and amounts to fideism is here buried as an unjustified...