Dr. Bahnsen and Michael Butler co-teach a 1995 summer seminar on transcendental arguments. With clear and jargon-free analysis, this course critiques various traditional theistic proofs, unpacks the philosophical background of transcendental reasoning, defends Cornelius Van Til’s presuppositional apologetic over against his critics, and above all, equips the saints to prove the objective truth of God’s existence—apart from which one cannot reason, make sense of reasoning, or prove anything at all.
01 — Four Types of Proof (1 of 10)
02 — Van Til’s Why I Believe in God (2 of 10)
03 — Kant in Context (3 of 10)
04 — Contemporary Transcendental Arguments, Part 1 (4 of 10)
05 — Contemporary Transcendental Arguments, Part 2 (5 of 10)
06 — Summary of Transcendental Arguments, Part 1 (6 of 10)
07 — Summary of Transcendental Arguments, Part 2 (7 of 10)
08 — Apologetical Transcendental Argument (8 of 10)
10 — Van Til’s Critics: Hoover, Dooyeweerd, Frame (10 of 10)